From disarmament to rearmament: elements for a sociology of critique of the Pacification Police Unit Program (article): mudanças entre as edições
Sem resumo de edição |
|||
(4 revisões intermediárias por 3 usuários não estão sendo mostradas) | |||
Linha 1: | Linha 1: | ||
'''Authors''': Palloma Menezes and Diogo Corrêa. | '''Authors''': Palloma Menezes and Diogo Corrêa. | ||
'''Originally posted on''': [http://www.vibrant.org.br/palloma-menezes-diogo-correa-from-disarmament-to-rearmament-elements-for-a-sociology-of-critique-of-the-pacification-police-unit-program/ Vibrant]. | '''Originally posted on''': [http://www.vibrant.org.br/palloma-menezes-diogo-correa-from-disarmament-to-rearmament-elements-for-a-sociology-of-critique-of-the-pacification-police-unit-program/ Vibrant]. | ||
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
Inspired by the reflections on the concept of critique proposed by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello, this article presents some elements for a sociology of critique of the Pacification Police Unit ([ | Inspired by the reflections on the concept of critique proposed by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello, this article presents some elements for a sociology of critique of the Pacification Police Unit ([[UPP – a redução da favela a três letras|Unidade de Polícia Pacificadora – UPPs]]) program. It offers a brief history of the project, typified in phases. We conduct a mapping and a temporal analysis of critiques made about the UPPs throughout the entire period of their existence from 2008 until today. This analysis is based on ethnographic research and interviews conducted by the authors between 2009 and 2015 in the first two [https://wikifavelas.com.br/index.php/Rumors_of_%E2%80%98Pacification%27:_The_Arrival_of_the_UPP_and_Changes_in_Public_Problems_in_Santa_Marta_and_Cidade_de_Deus_(article) “pacified” favelas] in the city of Rio de Janeiro ([[Dona* Marta or Santa* Marta?|Santa Marta]] and the [[Drugs in the City of God|Cidade de Deus]]), and on the analysis of news reports from the major and alternative media and of social networks. | ||
== Access the article == | == Access the article == | ||
<pdf height="800" width="1200">File: | <pdf height="800" width="1200">File:From disarmament to rearmament.pdf</pdf> | ||
[[Categoria:Verbetes em Inglês]] | [[Categoria:Verbetes em Inglês]] | ||
Linha 13: | Linha 12: | ||
[[Categoria:Temática - Segurança]] | [[Categoria:Temática - Segurança]] | ||
[[Categoria:Pacificação]] | [[Categoria:Pacificação]] | ||
[[Categoria: | [[Categoria:Artigos]] | ||
[[Categoria:Rio de Janeiro]] |
Edição atual tal como às 17h32min de 14 de julho de 2023
Authors: Palloma Menezes and Diogo Corrêa.
Originally posted on: Vibrant.
Abstract[editar | editar código-fonte]
Inspired by the reflections on the concept of critique proposed by Luc Boltanski and Eve Chiapello, this article presents some elements for a sociology of critique of the Pacification Police Unit (Unidade de Polícia Pacificadora – UPPs) program. It offers a brief history of the project, typified in phases. We conduct a mapping and a temporal analysis of critiques made about the UPPs throughout the entire period of their existence from 2008 until today. This analysis is based on ethnographic research and interviews conducted by the authors between 2009 and 2015 in the first two “pacified” favelas in the city of Rio de Janeiro (Santa Marta and the Cidade de Deus), and on the analysis of news reports from the major and alternative media and of social networks.
Access the article[editar | editar código-fonte]